• Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    How much torque though? HP is nice but power is in the torque as much if not more than the voltage(HP)

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Did they update the page since you commented? I see kw and kg on there… 🤷

      Now latest testing of an even lighter 12.7kg version on a more powerful dynamometer has shattered this record, with a staggering 750kW (>1000bhp) short-term peak rating, resulting in a new unofficial power density record of 59kW/kg

  • shininghero@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I wonder if we’ll ever get enough standardization across EVs so people can start doing the electric equivalent of an LS swap.
    I could see this being done on a Slate truck, along with an auxiliary EV battery bolted in the back.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s more about the batteries than the motor. You can make a motor that sucks down as much power as you want. The battery can’t necessarily provide that without damage.

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Hopefully solid-state batteries (once their production manages to ramp up to consumer vehicle scale) could allow for higher capacity and power delivery without the limitations or safety risks of current battery tech.

        • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I mean, I guess. Power output isn’t what I’m really hoping for on new battery tech. What we have is perfectly capable of 0-60 times that only thoroughbred performance street cars can meet (like Ariel Atom territory), and the top speed is plenty.

          Once you’re putting down 500hp, tires start to become a limiting factor. The torque that goes behind that number can stress the limit on all but the largest tires with the stickiest compounds.

          Safety, range, and weight reduction of new battery tech are great, though.

          • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yep, I have an EV and the way my partner drove it just eats through tires. We’re talking about $1.5k, 50k mile warranty tires being replaced at 20-25k because someone liked to pretend they’re a fucking astronaut on launch day.

            Not bitter.

              • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                I wish! The tire shop said that the last set was damaged by excessive acceleration, so they wouldn’t honor the warranty. I can’t argue - our EV has over 600 horsepower and almost 900 lb-ft of torque, so my partner is just destroying those poor tires.

                • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Oof, I’d question how they could even determine that beyond “shouldn’t have worn that fast” but I suppose they know what they’re doing…

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Lol:

    The new YASA axial flux motor weighs just 28 pounds, or about the same as a small dog.

    However, it delivers a jaw-dropping 750 kilowatts of power, which is the equivalent of 1,005 horsepower.

    I feel like we’d need peak horsepower output of a small dog to truly understand this.

    • DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      If it’s a Corgi, I would estimate the power output at .1 horsepower max. But if it’s a small dog the size of a large dog, then that’s something entirely different.

    • thefactremains@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      A dog’s power output comes from its muscle mass, which for a healthy dog is about 45% of its total body weight. This gives our 28-pound dog roughly 12.57 lbs (or 5.7 kg) of muscle.

      Studies of animal muscle show that the peak power output of vertebrate muscle tissue during a short, explosive burst (like a jump or the start of a sprint) is around 100 to 200 watts per kilogram of muscle.

      Now we can estimate the dog’s peak power:

      • Low estimate: 5.7 kg of muscle x 100 W/kg = 570 watts
      • High estimate: 5.7 kg of muscle x 200 W/kg = 1140 watts

      Converting these figures to horsepower (1 horsepower = 746 watts):

      • Low estimate: 570 W / 746 ≈ 0.76 horsepower
      • High estimate: 1140 W / 746 ≈ 1.5 horsepower

      So, a small 28-pound dog might be able to generate a peak power of around 0.75 to 1.5 horsepower for a very brief moment.

      So this YASA motor is somewhere between 670 and 1,340 times more powerful than the dog it’s being compared to in weight. That’s some jaw-dropping power output.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Stop burning the planet down to generate social media comments

            I mean, I thought it would be obvious my issue was with using AI to do so…

            Even if it had been a serious question.

            But, to be fair I was thinking of what a normal.person would be able to parse, and not people who’s critical thinking had already atrophied from offloading to AI.

            They probably don’t have any idea what I meant and would need it explicitly spelled out.

            • Nima@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              I didn’t realize it even was ai generated. but even if it is, that’s still a fairly off-putting way to respond.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                but even if it is, that’s still a fairly off-putting way to respond.

                No you’re right…

                It’s not like it’s literally burning our planet down and the people profiting off it aren’t tech bro fascists…

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Had an ex-friend who was a motorhead arguing that electric motors will never beat ICE because they lack comparable torque. Look, I’m no mechanic, but I never got my head around that.

    “You mean they don’t have enough torque to run a US destroyer?! Someone should call the Navy.”

    Seriously, if you’ve played with even a tiny electric motor, provide DC, it goes, instantly. What could he have possibly been trying to say?

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      My parents had an original Prius and it was a weedy little car that made those two hippies really happy. If that was his only experience with electric cars I can see why he’d think that.

      But the new ones are fucking rockets. I just don’t understand why they need all that. Can they make a cheaper one that’s got 300 horsepower?

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        . I just don’t understand why they need all that.

        Power sells, they can give that insane 0-60 sprint for very low cost, so it gets people to buy their product instead of a 6 liter V8.

          • MangoCats@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            It’s so sad, because we could make really great shitbox econo cars now. China, Japan and India are doing it, meanwhile in the U.S. we’re needing side-step assistance to climb into our tower-viewing position $80K+ ROADMASTER trucks and SUVs.

      • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Assuming that flying with an electric motor is a viable option (I have zero clue, but from what I heard currently its not that realistic that we will get electric planes)

        • BillBurBaggins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Small electric planes already exist. But yeah not passenger planes or to go any useful distance for the foreseeable future

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    This looks small enough to be installed within the wheel hub itself. Imagine a car with four motors, one inside each wheel. The entire floor pan could just be one thin battery, and everything above it could be passenger and storage space.

        • lemming741@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          They make sense for scooters, bikes, and other low speed or two wheel personal transport. For anything with an actual suspension (designed for a highway) there is just too much competition for space with brakes and suspension linkage. The unsprung weight, exposed high voltage cabling subject to road debris and accidents are problems too. And what to do hub motors really gain you?

          • eleitl@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Simplicity, no transmission. As to unsprung weight, designs like these have a ridiculous power density, so add only very little. Advanced suspensions are active anyway, so just part of the wheel robot.

            • lemming741@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              They DO require transmissions! A single speed planetary gear set is still required, same as current EV drives.

              Find me a hub motor datasheet with quoted power and torque below 1000 rpms. The YASA datasheets are all out to 8000 rpms. Useless at wheel speed.

              They’re quoting 30 second power numbers and dry weight without a gearbox. They’re fishing for dumb money.