BlueMAGA

  • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    If you have to vote between a candidate who wants to build 5 concentration camps and another candidate who wants to build one. You vote for the candidate that only wants to build only one concentration camp. Sure, both candidates are really bad, but one is considerably worse.

    Therefore, we must still vote for the lesser of two evils. Not voting at all because both sides bad is how democracy dies, especially when democracy itself is under attack right now.

    • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      If you have to vote between a candidate who wants to build 5 concentration camps and another candidate who wants to build one

      So you support China in their liberation of Tibet from feudal serfdom? You support the Soviet Union destroying Nazism despite the excesses made in the gulag years? Or do you only extend this courtesy to capitalist imperialist regimes?

      • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Obviously not. I don’t support building concentration camps in general, and China is a bad example since there’s no opposing party in Chinq. Admittedly, the example I gave was a bit on the extreme side. Regardless, I still disagree that if both sides are bad then they automatically are equalivent and thus voting is pointless as the meme seems to imply.

        If Harris had won the 2024 election, do you honestly think she would be mass deporting immigrants without a trial, starting a trade war with China, attempt to cut funding for FEMA, etc? Sure, I’ll give you that she would have been content with the genocide in Gaza and would have been propping up the capitalist status quo. However, is that truly equilvent to what Trump has done in just his first year of his second term?