Congratulations, you have rediscovered that people make mistakes and thus their actions do not always perfectly align with their convictions.
That doesn’t make them a hypocrite, it makes them human.
It isn’t as if these individuals are purposely endorsing AI imagery, more that they have simply failed to spot it as such. With how these algorithms are advancing, it is becoming more difficult for the casual user.
Your little strawman is creating a character where you get to assign the intent behind its actions as you wish to have it support your argument and then claiming it is representative of all users. No one is falling for it.
The “anti-ai” threadiverse users are still using the threadiverse to upvote ai content.
Unless you’re not aware of the idiom.
Congratulations, you have rediscovered that people make mistakes and thus their actions do not always perfectly align with their convictions.
That doesn’t make them a hypocrite, it makes them human.
It isn’t as if these individuals are purposely endorsing AI imagery, more that they have simply failed to spot it as such. With how these algorithms are advancing, it is becoming more difficult for the casual user.
Your little strawman is creating a character where you get to assign the intent behind its actions as you wish to have it support your argument and then claiming it is representative of all users. No one is falling for it.
Do you know what an apology is?