I see how it can be interpreted that way, but that’s not how I meant it. It is clearly not flawless.
I meant it from the perspective of an employer. If you want a good workforce that puts in effort, a worforce of probkem solvers that want to help the company be th best it can be. Than you gotta put effort into those employees, offer them the oppertunities to be th best they can be, that includes things like a good base salary, security, support.
Sort of the difference between the Rhineland model and the Algosaxon model of organisation.
I see how it can be interpreted that way, but that’s not how I meant it. It is clearly not flawless.
I meant it from the perspective of an employer. If you want a good workforce that puts in effort, a worforce of probkem solvers that want to help the company be th best it can be. Than you gotta put effort into those employees, offer them the oppertunities to be th best they can be, that includes things like a good base salary, security, support.
Sort of the difference between the Rhineland model and the Algosaxon model of organisation.
I feel like you should append your prior comment with this good clarification!
Ah yeah that makes more sense