According to Mozilla, roughly 2/5 (that’s 40%) of its expenses were to pay leadership.
Unless “paying leadership” now includes real estate costs, marketing, legal, consultants, etc…
Not sure why you’re so wound up on this, you read the financial statement wrong which isn’t a huge deal, not sure why you’re so adamant to argue this point
I’m not going into your ass to find where you got real estate from. The other line items in your list figure under program as well.
But congratulations, you just proved that your figure is wrong (“<1%”), and that you can’t read (equating leadership costs with executive pay). You can now have a cookie.
Now cite my words that say 40% is executive pay.
This u?
Unless “paying leadership” now includes real estate costs, marketing, legal, consultants, etc…
Not sure why you’re so wound up on this, you read the financial statement wrong which isn’t a huge deal, not sure why you’re so adamant to argue this point
I’m not going into your ass to find where you got real estate from. The other line items in your list figure under program as well.
But congratulations, you just proved that your figure is wrong (“<1%”), and that you can’t read (equating leadership costs with executive pay). You can now have a cookie.
You got me there, I was .2+% off on my rough estimation. Have a good day man