You are giving youtube the benefit of the doubt, on israel, and 36 people agreed? Jesus christ.

The lawmakers would jamn them and parent corporation in a thousand ways not related to this. No evidence why they are jamning them to challenge in court. That is how it is done now.

Ie background checks for someone that would pass the check but has detractors, background check never comes through, they have no idea just wait they say. That way you have no right to get a copy of the information used against you as prescribed by law, no legal challenges, etc.

Lawyers working for super rich fucktwats run the west, and it is more of a shitshow everyday.

All social media has been since before the final solution for the gaza ghetto.

Including reddit, facebook, twitter, instagram, tik tok now.

In private companies courts decided we have no rights, but the government can lean on them in secret, creating a de facto government censorship of speech.

Same as warrantless surveillance, the government buys private data broker info without cause or warrant on everyone, does another end run around the bill of rights.

We need clear rules we can challenge enforcrment actiond on, I would say if not settled by an appeal to be decided by a jury of users, but I am an english common law partisan like that.

State laws could work but courts would cancel them the first time israel was criticized. And feds would pre empt.