Tbh I’m just new to the computer science scene - I’ve taken one class so far on the fundamentals of programming and have only seen a real language in my free time as of yet.

It didn’t occur to me that the webpage which references another for an image would still be culpable for the space taken up by the image, because with on-disk memory management you can do tricks to reduce sizes with pointers and I just thought it would be analogous. It feels painfully obvious to me why that’s stupid now lol

Once the users browser has the path to that image…

I dunno why that didn’t occur to me, that makes sense

Do you actually have to provide the image? Couldn’t you provide a pointer to the image? Like those thumbnails that are just links on the backends but appear as images when loaded

Same. My sister helped my partner and I make some edibles with a bunch of trim we had saved. She had been smoking heavier than me for twice as long, and got absolutely smuckered by these edibles. We, however, were slamming dabs alongside the edibles because they weren’t doing shit

2/3? And what are we doing with the last third of an antidote?

There’s 3 antidotes per 4 people, or 3/4th dose per person.