It was not “debatebro” because nothing I said, except probably my first comment, was debating. Sorry for the confusion.

I need additional information, probably about Nutomic’s behavior, to see how it’s related to what you’re talking about.

Prove that this is not false equivalence fallacy. Maybe there’s additional info about Nutomic that I’m missing.

Refusing to make someone’s financial situation easier until they stop being transphobic is not a convincing argument against transphobia. Think about how your actions affect your side’s reputation from the other side’s perspective.

Edit: to be clear, this is not a statement on whether or not Nutomic is transphobic.