Pennomi

I mean, vampires are immortal, not indestructible. If he really had it that bad I’m sure a date with a vampire hunter would solve it quickly.

Dude definitely needed therapy.

Fuck Google, it’s my device and Google is not my mom.

“Legally” doesn’t mean shit if it’s not enforceable. Besides, removing watermarks is trivial.

There is no technically rigorous way to filter AI content, unfortunately.

Indeed, the art is the reverse heist.

This is the best answer, unless you actually want to get hired of course.

I saw something similar in an interview question once. You’re on a desert island and all you have is a laptop with connectivity to the internet (not gps like on a phone). How do you get rescued? Your battery won’t last forever!

Wishlisted your horror collection! I like your art style.

That’s not what I’m saying. What I’m saying is that it’s going to be increasingly difficult (for the layperson) to tell if a work is by a human or computer. You and I may think there’s some sort of moral superiority in human art, but the average TikTok user doesn’t give a fuck… and they outnumber us greatly.

Precisely. AI art is bad because the users making “art” with it essentially have such bad taste they’ll publish anything the AI shits out.

There exist artistic ways to use AI as a tool, but none of them are easy. In fact they might be harder than just painting the damn picture yourself.

I am skeptical about “never”, but right now I agree that’s true. I expect it to be true for many years to come. That being said, we have seen a lot of improvement (over even the last few months) in AI image quality, composition, and prompt adherence.

Vibe coding or no, this is a massive QA failure.