

this entire thread is about the STG petition, and thus about the theoretical possibility of how laws could change


this entire thread is about the STG petition, and thus about the theoretical possibility of how laws could change


mandatory minimum warranties are also not relatively minimal effort and yet we have laws that require those… most consumer protection standards aren’t minimal effort: that doesn’t mean we don’t make laws to ensure consumers get what they are expecting when they hand over money
why shouldn’t handing over source code to a game that’s being shut down (and apparently that nobody finds any value in since it wasn’t even bought in bankruptcy auction) be mandated as a last resort?


literally what STG is about


and the law is able to make license conditions illegal/unenforceable (like non-compete clauses in employment contracts)


usually in bankruptcy the game gets sold in order to help pay debts… whoever buys the game assumes the responsibility of contributing to run the online services, or provide options for others to… in the case that nobody buys the game (im not entirely sure what happens to the IP in that case) but it’s relatively minimal effort to release server source code or documentation OR even just remove the online parts that’s usually just for DRM which is now pretty irrelevant because you’re shutting it down anyway so why would anyone care if someone pirates it?!


not to mention whose recent valuations have basically been about selling their data to train models which will be used to make AI slop
voyager automatically opens links in reader mode for me and it works about 80% of the time
(but this article it doesn’t work for)