• perishthethought@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m no expert, but the issue here seems to be replacing many smaller contracts with one big one for Palantir. I. E., one agenda headed in one dark direction.

    But what do I know?

    • majster@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Honestly I don’t know what would be the difference if this was a contract with Oracle, Microsoft, SAP etc. That is democratic stack?

      • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I guess the crows are coming home to roost in that the owners of these companies are prepared to use them as leverage (starlink) and also are more comfortable airing some pretty wild views of how they think the world should work (Thiel with his Antichrist obsession, Ellison with his ideas for a surveillance state, The general tech bro Curtis Yarvin worship).

        Start joining the dots and it starts becoming hard not to be concerned where this is headed.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      that’s how pretty much all business works though.

      as your company grows it’s preferable to have fewer larger providers for services. when you are small you have multiple vendors.

      largerly because the vendors that provide extensive services… cater to larger companies, not smaller ones.