• weegee90@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Windows five minutes after installing a web browser: “Welcome to Edge! We’ve imported your tabs from Chrome for you.”

    • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s a very usable browser and vivaldi explicitly do no AI, unlike firefox. I get that firefox is the only serious cross platform competitor to chromium, but mozilla really does consistently shoot itself in the foot. it’s like they’re masochistic.

      edit: vivaldi also actually seems to have a vision and design goals, which firefox sort of lacks.

        • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Firefox has been slowly ramping up AI integration and data collection/telemetry. Fortunately theres many forks that rip all that out. Librewolf and ironfox are good examples.

          The truth is Mozilla is not profitable as a company and FF would have died a long time ago if Google didn’t pay up to keep them alive to help avoid monopoly busting suits. In a worse timeline we don’t even have modern FF to fork from or ublock in 2025.

        • Derpgon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I upvoted, but not always. With the CLI you know exactly if you installing from core/extra (which you don’t usually need to check PKGBUILD) and executing as privileged, compared to AUR which you either install manually or use an AUR package manager like YAY which strongly discourages running as priviliged, and offers checking PKGBUILD on both install and update.

          For example, Pamac doesn’t show this - or at least didn’t back when I used it on Manjaro.

      • gsdsam@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Genuine question; what is it about them that appeals to you? I used them for a while as a few things on kubuntu defaulted to snap but after a while I kept running into different issues that don’t occur on the flathub/deb counterparts so I’ve cut them out for the most part.

        • tsugu@gregtech.euOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I like Ubuntu and related technologies around it so when I wanted to learn Linux packaging I went for snap. It turned out to be not as hard as I thought, and from my experience they run just fine. And are capable of packaging more types of apps than flatpak.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            I think their update model is actually great. People are super hesitant to have apps auto update but its important to push out security updates quickly to minimise damage. It can be easily disabled if you insist on manually updating.

            • tsugu@gregtech.euOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              I can confirm the auto updates work. When I push a new version, all devices start using it within days.