BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 6 days agoAnother chance for JPEG XL? PDF will support format as 'preferred solution'www.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up133arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up133arrow-down1external-linkAnother chance for JPEG XL? PDF will support format as 'preferred solution'www.theregister.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square7linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareonlinepersona@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 days agoIs this the right format? I thought there was an alternative with better compression and it was opensource and without royalties.
minus-squareBrikoX@lemmy.zipOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 days agoAVIF and JPEG XL are two of the top of the line standards, but both have different strengths and weaknesses. Each of them are also being backed by a different monopoly power hence neither of them being implemented universally.
minus-squareonlinepersona@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoOnce you mentioned AVIF, I found it “FLIF”, but JPEG-XL is an extension thereof.
Is this the right format? I thought there was an alternative with better compression and it was opensource and without royalties.
AVIF and JPEG XL are two of the top of the line standards, but both have different strengths and weaknesses. Each of them are also being backed by a different monopoly power hence neither of them being implemented universally.
Once you mentioned AVIF, I found it “FLIF”, but JPEG-XL is an extension thereof.